and now, your moment of Zen

Constitutional rights should not be limited by genitalia or the ability to engage in a particular form of sexual intimacy.

From the dissent in a recent N.J. decision barring homosexual couples from marrying: link. I strongly suggest reading it. Next, the NJ Supreme Court will hear this case, and it seems certain that this case or one like it will be before the U.S. Supreme Court very soon. The dissent makes a multitude of good points, such as the one above which made me laugh.